
Adyen Data Engineer interview typically runs 4 rounds: recruiter interview, first interview, team interview, and a HackerRank test. It took about a few weeks and felt uneven, with a light early screening before the coding check.
$122K
Avg. Base Comp
$133K
Avg. Total Comp
4
Typical Rounds
2-4 weeks
Process Length
Our candidates report that Adyen’s Data Engineer process is less about theatrical difficulty and more about whether you can work cleanly with real data structures. The standout signal is the coding work: the PySpark portion was described as straightforward on the surface, but join logic and dataframe handling were where mistakes could quietly sink an otherwise solid attempt. That tells us the bar here is not “can you memorize Spark APIs,” but “can you manipulate data correctly without introducing subtle bugs.”
A recurring theme is that the company seems to value engineers who can move between implementation and product-minded collaboration. One candidate noted behavioral prompts around being collaborative to solve a problem and sharing a project that aligned with company values, which suggests they are looking for people who can explain tradeoffs and work well across teams, not just write code in isolation. We also saw that the recruiter conversation felt light and uneven, so the real evaluation appears to happen once the process reaches hands-on technical work.
The non-obvious takeaway is that Adyen seems to reward precision over complexity. The Python task involved JSON serialization/deserialization with existing and new classes, which is the kind of exercise that exposes whether someone reads requirements carefully and preserves structure. In other words, candidates who do best here are usually the ones who are methodical, comfortable with practical data transformations, and attentive to edge cases that can break a pipeline in production.
Synthesized from 1 candidate report by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Adyen process.
I got into this process through a referral. The lead of the team that was hiring had posted the opening on LinkedIn, and I applied with his referral. The whole thing took roughly four to five weeks across four rounds: an HR intro call, a technical round built around live code review, a systems design round, and a leadership round.
The intro call was a standard HR conversation. The technical round was a live code review, so the focus was on working through code with the interviewers rather than answering isolated trivia. Systems design came next, followed by the leadership round, where I was asked how my experience would fit into what they called Adyen's formula. They wanted a concrete example from a previous job or from my studies, not a general answer, so I'd arrive with one specific story ready.
Across the technical rounds, the questions covered Python, PySpark, cloud-native tools, and CI/CD. I'd treat those as the core of your prep. Be able to say what you built with each, what went wrong, and what you would change.
I didn't get an offer. If I were preparing again, I'd spend less time on general theory and more on walking through specific projects in each of those areas, and I'd make sure my examples clearly connect to how the team works.
Prep tip from this candidate
Expect a live code review and a systems design round, and prepare concrete examples of how you have used Python, PySpark, cloud-native tools, and CI/CD. Have one specific past project ready to explain how your experience fits the team's way of working, since the leadership round asked for exactly that.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Adyen
Design a database system for Swipe Inc. to store API keys and related payment transaction data
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Text Editor With OOP | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Decreasing Tech Debt | |
| Dot Product | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Last Transaction | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Cumulative Distribution | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Total Spent on Products | |
| Paired Products | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Month Over Month | |
| Cumulative Reset | |
| Like Tracker | |
| Third Purchase | |
| Duplicate Rows | |
| Find the First Non-Repeating Character in a String | |
| Subscription Retention | |
| String Shift | |
| Google Maps Improvement |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
An initial recruiter conversation that was described as fairly light and not very evaluative. The candidate was asked about recent achievements and received some instructions ahead of time, but did not even get a full self-introduction prompt.
A first interview followed the recruiter screen, likely serving as an early behavioral and fit check. Based on the experience, this stage was part of a broader sequence that included collaborative and values-based questions.
The candidate then met with the team before receiving the coding assessment. This round appears to have included behavioral discussion, including examples of collaboration and projects aligned with Adyen’s values.
A practical coding assessment sent after the interviews, split roughly 60% PySpark and 40% Python. The PySpark portion focused on dataset manipulation and joins using a template, while the Python portion involved JSON serialization/deserialization with existing and new classes.