Candidates for Microsoft's Cloud & Platform Engineer role describe scenario-based technical conversations on Azure, networking and cloud design, plus customer-facing questions. Reported loops range from two calls to five or more rounds.
$130K
Avg. Base Comp
$180K
Avg. Total Comp
2-7 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Three candidates describe Microsoft's Cloud & Platform Engineer interview, and the loop differs from person to person. One reports a technical call with a manager and two tech leads, another describes five interviews, and a third describes two phone screens followed by five back-to-back technical blocks of about 44 minutes each. Don't assume your loop will be short.
The clearest theme is reasoning out loud on cloud scenarios. One candidate who had never used Azure says the interviewers cared more about how they approached a problem than about service knowledge. That candidate was asked to describe the Microsoft cloud pillars and was also tested on networking, operating systems and identity. Another candidate faced an open-ended cloud solutions question, with Azure as the platform to reason about first.
Coding can appear too. One candidate was asked to define a naming convention for blob storage and write a function that pulls blobs from a date range. They felt the interviewers had a specific solution in mind, so explain your trade-offs and the alternatives you considered. The same candidate was asked about AWS.
Expect people questions as well. Two candidates were asked how they would handle an upset customer, and one was asked where they saw themselves in five years, even in a technical setting. One candidate received an offer and two did not. Practice Azure fundamentals, an open-ended cloud design walkthrough, a small coding exercise and a clear customer-conversation answer.
Synthesized from 3 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Microsoft process.
What stuck with me most was how little the interviewers cared whether I already knew Azure. I had never worked with it, and when the questions moved into specific services, I could only answer by talking through how I would tackle the problem. That turned out to be the point. My first call was a technical conversation with a manager and two tech leads, and the questions were the kind you would actually face on the job. Rather than quizzing me on definitions, they gave me scenarios and wanted to hear my reasoning step by step.
I wish I had studied the Microsoft cloud pillars more carefully beforehand, since they came up directly and I had to describe what each one is for. Networking was a big part of the technical discussion, and they also checked my general knowledge of operating systems and identity, which I had not expected to be part of a cloud role. The process length varies, from two calls up to five rounds, so don't assume your loop will be short.
The second call was the one that made me think more about people than technology. I was asked how I would handle a customer who was angry about something unrelated to Microsoft but believed it was our fault. There was no single correct script. I think they wanted to see how I would listen, set boundaries, and work out what the customer actually needed. Culture and benefits also came up, and one thing I'd stress is communication in English. Be ready to explain your reasoning clearly rather than just arriving at an answer.
Overall it felt more like a conversation about how I think than an exam. I accepted the offer.
Prep tip from this candidate
Review the Azure cloud pillars and networking fundamentals, and practice talking through scenario questions out loud. The interviewers were grading how you reason more than whether you already knew the specific service.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Microsoft
Given two sorted lists, write a function to merge them into one sorted list.
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Find the Missing Number | |
| Find Bigrams | |
| Scrambled Tickets | |
| Minimum Change | |
| Good Grades and Favorite Colors | |
| Find the First Non-Repeating Character in a String | |
| The Brackets Problem | |
| N-gram Dictionary | |
| Level Of Rain Water In 2D Terrain | |
| Real-Time Transaction Streaming | |
| Greatest Common Denominator | |
| Cyclic Detection | |
| Binary Tree Conversion | |
| Longest Increasing Subsequence | |
| Find Duplicate Numbers in a List | |
| Swap Variables | |
| Target Indices | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Swapping Nodes | |
| 5th Largest Number | |
| Portfolio Platform Architecture | |
| Merge N Sorted Lists | |
| Messenger Service Design | |
| Target Value Search | |
| Data Pipelines and Aggregation | |
| Binary Tree Validation | |
| Client Solution Pushback | |
| Legacy System Heartbeat Monitor | |
| Combinational Dice Rolls |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
One candidate reports a recruiter reaching out, and another describes two phone screens before the main loop. The recruiting team was described as helpful with logistics. These calls may cover role fit and background, but the reports do not detail their content, so confirm the format with your recruiter.
One candidate describes a first technical call with a manager and two tech leads. They were given job-like scenarios and asked to reason step by step rather than recite definitions. Topics reportedly included the Microsoft cloud pillars, networking, operating systems and identity. Not knowing Azure in advance did not appear to be disqualifying for this candidate.
One candidate reports an open-ended cloud solutions question with Azure as the platform to reason about first. Another was asked to design a blob storage naming convention and write a date-range retrieval function, and was also asked about AWS. The cloud design question was called the most open-ended, so state your assumptions and trade-offs.
Reports of the loop length vary. One candidate describes five interviews. Another describes five technical blocks of about 44 minutes each, with a 15-minute break after each, following two phone screens. A third says the process can run from two calls up to five rounds. Plan for stamina, since the structure appears to vary.
Two candidates were asked how they would handle an upset customer, which one saw as a test of listening, boundaries and understanding what the customer needs. One candidate was also asked where they saw themselves in five years during a technical setting. One candidate stressed explaining your reasoning clearly in English.
