
Walmart Data Scientist interviews typically run three to five or more rounds covering ML fundamentals, SQL with window functions, coding, and business case or A/B testing questions, with structure varying by team and level. Candidates report inconsistent interviewer quality and slow post-interview communication.
$155K
Avg. Base Comp
$254K
Avg. Total Comp
3-6 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Walmart's Data Scientist interviews are best understood as a multi-stage technical gauntlet that blends machine learning depth with SQL, coding, and applied business cases, rather than a single standardized script. Reported loops ranged from three rounds to five or more, and structure clearly varied by team and level. One candidate's five-round Senior Data Scientist loop took about three months. Slow or vague communication after final rounds came up repeatedly, so plan for a process that may move slowly.
Machine learning carries the most weight. Be ready to:
Some loops also touched deep learning, NLP, transformers and BERT, LLMs, and agentic AI. For a staff-level loop, one candidate faced ML system design prompts such as a catalogue policy violation detector or a user review summarizer.
SQL was generally practical: two-table joins, join types, and window functions like lag and lead. Coding ranged from LeetCode-easy Python and pandas preprocessing to implementing K-means from scratch or a HackerRank-style array problem. Practice both data manipulation and clean algorithmic code.
Business-facing rounds covered:
Hiring manager and director conversations appeared late in several loops, and some candidates found them dismissive. Bring crisp, concrete stories about your past projects, your model evaluation choices, and how you resolved conflict.
Synthesized from 10 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Walmart process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Walmart
Write a query that returns all neighborhoods that have 0 users.
| Question | |
|---|---|
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Last Transaction | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Scrambled Tickets | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Cumulative Sales Since Last Restocking | |
| Rejection Reason | |
| Reducing Error Margin | |
| Order Addresses | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Over 100 Dollars | |
| Using R Squared | |
| Groups of Anagrams | |
| Random Forest Explanation | |
| Seasonal Product Performance Analysis | |
| Longest Increasing Subsequence | |
| Valid Anagram | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Lasso vs Ridge | |
| Assumptions of Linear Regression | |
| Bias - Variance Tradeoff and Class Imbalance in Finance | |
| Triplet Counting | |
| Rider Discount | |
| Black Friday Shopping Spree | |
| Type I and II Errors | |
| Bias vs. Variance Tradeoff | |
| Moving Window |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Some candidates applied through a referral. The recruiter call covered background, work experience, what the candidate was looking for, and an overview of the team and role. Communication later in the process was uneven across reports, so confirm the planned round structure early.
One candidate described a 60-minute first round. About 40 minutes went to ML basics, SQL join types, MLOps, cloud deployment, a past project, and how the model was evaluated. The final 20 minutes were a Python task on preprocessing a dataset before fitting a standard model.
Coding difficulty varied by team. One candidate described LeetCode-simple Python. Another faced list and dictionary optimization and implementing K-means from scratch. Others got a HackerRank array problem (Poisonous Plants) or a pandas-only session on preprocessing and parameter tuning.
ML rounds covered bias-variance tradeoff, XGBoost versus random forest, Gini impurity, logistic regression, overfitting, multicollinearity, dropout, clustering, and probability distributions. Some also touched transformers, BERT, LLMs, and agentic AI. A staff-level loop used ML system design prompts. SQL covered two-table joins and window functions like lag and lead.
Candidates reported product metrics and in-depth A/B testing questions, marketing-style questions on customer modeling and multi-touch attribution, and a scenario on building a model to predict product demand across Walmart stores by region.
Several loops ended with a hiring manager conversation, a director-level round, or both. Topics included conflict resolution and resume walkthroughs. Some candidates found the hiring manager round dismissive, so prepare concise, concrete stories about your past work.