United Airlines Pricing Analyst interview typically runs 2 rounds: online interview and in-person interview. The process usually takes a few weeks and is friendly but competitive.
$75K
Avg. Base Comp
$84K
Avg. Total Comp
2
Typical Rounds
2-4 weeks
Process Length
Our candidates report that United’s Pricing Analyst interviews feel approachable on the surface, but the company is still looking for people who can think like operators. The strongest signal wasn’t technical trickery; it was whether candidates could explain their work clearly, own mistakes without defensiveness, and connect their experience to the business side of pricing and revenue. One candidate specifically noted STAR-style prompts around empathy and a job misstep, which tells us United is paying attention to judgment, maturity, and how you handle pressure in real-world situations.
A recurring theme is that the process stays friendly while quietly filtering for role awareness. Multiple candidates described the vibe as relaxed and even casual, yet they also mentioned questions that tested industry understanding, not just resume recitation. That combination matters: United seems to favor people who can be personable and grounded, but still speak intelligently about how pricing decisions affect the airline business. We’ve also seen signs that competition can be real even when the conversation feels smooth, so a polished interview alone isn’t enough. The candidates who stand out here are the ones who sound practical, self-aware, and ready to discuss the business implications of their past work.
Synthesized from 1 candidate report by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the United Airlines process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at United Airlines
Describing a data project and its challenges
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Boarding Times Bias | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| User Experience Percentage | |
| Distance Traveled | |
| Manager Team Sizes | |
| Download Facts | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Weighted Keys | |
| Third Purchase | |
| Button AB Test | |
| Normal Distribution Sample | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Pre-Launching Shows | |
| WAU vs Open Rates | |
| Network Experiment Design | |
| Assumptions of Linear Regression | |
| Revenue Retention | |
| Google Maps Improvement | |
| Demand Metrics | |
| Type I and II Errors | |
| Christmas Dinner Ingredient Optimization | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Testing Price Increase | |
| Client Solution Pushback | |
| Reward Experiment | |
| Uber Eats Success | |
| Random Weighted Driver | |
| Uber User Journey |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
The first round was conducted online and was mostly behavioral. Expect STAR-style questions about past experiences, such as showing empathy or describing a mistake at work, along with some questions that test your understanding of the pricing/revenue role and the airline business.
The second round was held in person and had a similarly relaxed, casual tone. Interviewers continued with behavioral questions and light role/industry knowledge checks, focusing on how you think about the business side of pricing rather than deep technical casework.
As part of the onsite visit, candidates completed a drug test on site. This was handled during the interview process itself, so no separate trip was needed.
The process was not an immediate yes/no decision, and the candidate noted some delay because there were more applicants than openings. The offer came later after the interviews were completed.
