
LinkedIn Business Intelligence interview typically runs 3 rounds: HR call, hiring manager, timed SQL test. The process took about a week and felt rushed and heavily technical.
$169K
Avg. Base Comp
$233K
Avg. Total Comp
3-4
Typical Rounds
1-2 weeks
Process Length
Our candidates report that LinkedIn’s Business Intelligence interviews can feel unusually compressed and heavily technical, with very little room for the kind of back-and-forth many people expect in a BI conversation. The clearest signal is that the team seems to care less about polished storytelling and more about whether you can get to a correct answer quickly when the clock is visible. In one experience, the hiring manager conversation barely opened up before the candidate was pushed into a timed SQL exercise, which suggests the bar is set around immediate execution rather than extended discussion.
A recurring theme is the plain-text, no-frills SQL format: solving in Notepad, under tight time pressure, with limited opportunity to narrate every assumption. That changes what matters. We’ve seen candidates do better when they can move cleanly from problem to query without needing a lot of scaffolding from the interviewer. Another non-obvious takeaway is that the process may feel one-sided by design; multiple signals point to a team prioritizing technical throughput over collaboration cues or culture fit. For candidates, that means the real test is not just SQL fluency, but whether you can stay precise and calm when the interview feels more like a speed check than a dialogue.
Synthetized from 1 candidates reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Linkedin process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Linkedin
Write a function to get the month_over_month change in revenue for 2019 rounded to 2 decimal places
| Question | |
|---|---|
| User Experience Percentage | |
| Over-Budget Projects | |
| Repeat Job Postings | |
| Network Experiment Design | |
| Delivery Estimate Model | |
| Declining Applicants | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Recruiting Leads | |
| Career Jumping | |
| Testing Price Increase | |
| Job Training Program Evaluation | |
| Type I and II Errors | |
| Unbiased Estimator | |
| Scrapers or Users | |
| 180 Day Job Postings | |
| Green Dot | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| Understanding Dynamic Pricing Strategy | |
| Ranking Metrics | |
| Activity Conversion | |
| Regularization and Validation | |
| Ad Engagement Analysis for Qualified Users | |
| Statistically Significant Test | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Button AB Test | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Top Three Salaries |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
A brief introductory call with HR that focuses on introductions and a quick walk-through of your resume. The conversation is mostly high-level and serves as an initial screening before moving to the next round.
A short conversation with the hiring manager that may only last 15 to 20 minutes before transitioning into a technical exercise. The discussion appears rushed and is followed quickly by a SQL assessment rather than a deeper behavioral or team-fit conversation.
You are given a SQL question and asked to solve it in Notepad under strict time pressure. The emphasis is on speed and accuracy, with little room to explain assumptions or walk through your approach in detail.
After the interview, the recruiter follows up with the final decision. In this experience, the candidate received a rejection about a week later.