Epic Software Engineer candidates commonly report a broad online assessment, a conversational screen, and, for some, a longer case-study-oriented final session.
$140K
Avg. Base Comp
$180K
Avg. Total Comp
3 rounds
Typical Rounds
1-2 weeks
Process Length
Epic Software Engineer candidates most often describe an assessment-led process rather than a sequence of conventional coding interviews. The online assessment is the recurring technical checkpoint: several candidates reported a fast math or logic segment, a longer math-and-reasoning section, a made-up programming-language exercise, and a small set of coding problems. Reported coding difficulty ranges from easy to medium, though one candidate encountered a harder median-of-two-sorted-arrays-style problem. Practice explaining your reasoning and manually checking solutions under time pressure.
Candidates who described a live screen said it was usually conversational: resume projects, prior experience, motivation for Epic, and a challenge they overcame were reported themes. A few were asked about specific web-stack experience, including TypeScript or React/Next.js. Prepare a concise project walkthrough that explains the design choices you made and how you would extend the work.
For candidates who advanced, reports describe a longer virtual session with informational conversations, behavioral discussion, a pairing exercise, and a practical case. A reported healthcare-oriented prompt involved minimizing clinic wait times. Treat this as an exercise in structured judgment, prioritization, and communication rather than evidence of a fixed system-design curriculum. One recent candidate reported completing the full process in less than two weeks, but the available accounts do not establish a standard end-to-end duration or identical number of rounds.
Synthesized from 19 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Epic process.
The assessment was the part I found most demanding. After applying, I completed logic-style questions, including some in a made-up programming language, along with coding questions in the medium-to-hard LeetCode range; one was essentially Median of Two Sorted Arrays. The job description initially suggested hiring in my local city, but the application made clear that the role required relocating to Wisconsin, so I would confirm that early if location matters to you.
After the assessment, I had a phone interview, then a design challenge, followed by a final interview process that ran roughly three to four hours. The final stage included a very basic system-design-style discussion; a representative prompt was how to design a system that minimizes wait time at a health care center. There was also at least one behavioral question about why I chose my college. Overall, the process covered both algorithmic problem solving and a practical healthcare-oriented design scenario, with the longest stretch being the final interview day.
I ultimately did not receive an offer. I’d focus prep on medium-to-hard array and algorithm questions, especially problems in the vein of finding the median of two sorted arrays, and be ready to explain a simple healthcare wait-time system clearly. Also verify the Wisconsin relocation requirement before investing too far in the process.
Prep tip from this candidate
Practice medium-to-hard assessment problems such as Median of Two Sorted Arrays, and prepare to walk through a simple system for reducing patient wait times at a health care center. Confirm the Wisconsin relocation requirement early, since it may differ from the location shown in the job description.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Epic
Given an integer N, write a function that returns all of the prime numbers up to N
| Question | |
|---|---|
| The Brackets Problem | |
| Valid Anagram | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Prime Numbers Identification | |
| Search Timeout | |
| Combinational Dice Rolls | |
| String Palindromes | |
| Deciding Between Solutions | |
| Distributed Authentication Model | |
| Testing Constraints | |
| Client Solution Pushback | |
| Two Cars | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Marketing Workflow Optimization | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| Tic-Tac-Toe Outcome | |
| Measuring Text Difficulty | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Weighted Keys | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Employee Salaries (ETL Error) | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Detecting ECG Tachycardia Runs | |
| Size of Joins | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Sort Strings | |
| String Mapping | |
| Most Repetition |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Multiple candidates report a multi-part assessment with a very short speed round, math or logic questions, a made-up programming language, and several coding problems. Candidates describe coding as usually easy to medium, although one reported a more difficult algorithmic prompt. Practice solving and checking code without relying on execution.
Candidates report a relaxed phone conversation after or around the assessment. Topics included resume experience, project details, why Epic, and an example of overcoming a technical problem. Some candidates were also asked about TypeScript, React, or Next.js experience; prepare only the technologies you can discuss from your own background.
Candidates who reached a final session report a longer virtual block, commonly around three to four-and-a-half hours. It may include informational sessions, a pairing exercise or technical discussion, a case study, and HR or behavioral conversation. Reported cases used clinic wait-time or task-prioritization scenarios, emphasizing clear tradeoffs and reasoning.
