Epic Business Analyst interview typically runs 3 rounds: online assessment, screening call, phone interview. The process is assessment-heavy and can take several weeks.
$91K
Avg. Base Comp
$92K
Avg. Total Comp
4-5
Typical Rounds
2-4 weeks
Process Length
Our candidates report that Epic cares less about polished salesmanship and more about whether you can reason clearly through messy, practical problems. The long assessment upfront sets that tone immediately: it’s not just one aptitude check, but a mix of analytical, personality, and IQ-style testing that feels designed to see how you sustain focus and consistency under pressure. That same pattern carries into the live conversations, where the interviewer asked about workflow improvements, ambiguity, and how candidates think through a problem rather than simply whether they know the “right” answer.
A recurring theme is Epic’s use of oddball prompts like “Why are manhole covers round?” and “If you were a road sign, what would you be and why?” We’ve seen these questions trip up candidates who over-prepare for a standard behavioral script. What seems to matter is not the novelty itself, but whether you can explain your logic out loud without getting flustered. Multiple candidates also noted that the tone stayed warm and conversational, with a strong emphasis on background, relevant projects, and motivation for Epic. In practice, that means the strongest candidates are the ones who can connect their experience to process improvement and healthcare impact in a way that feels concrete, not rehearsed.
Synthetized from 1 candidates reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Epic process.
The part that stood out most to me was how assessment-heavy the process was before I even got to the real conversations. After I submitted my resume on Epic’s website, they got back to me quickly and sent over a fairly long online assessment. It was manageable, but it definitely took time, and I’d recommend finding a quiet place before starting because it felt more like a test session than a quick screening. The exam had that SAT-like feel to it: not especially hard, but long enough that it required focus. I also had aptitude-style testing that covered IQ, personality, and analytical thinking, so it wasn’t just one type of question. After the initial screening call, I moved on to a phone interview with no video, which surprised me a bit. That round was pretty standard behavioral and experience-based stuff, and the interviewer was warm and spoke positively about the company. They asked me to talk through my background, relevant projects I’d worked on, what I was interested in, and why I wanted to work at Epic. There were also a lot of situational questions, like how I’d think through a problem and what I’d do if I saw a workflow that could be improved. One of the more unusual questions was, “Why are manhole covers round?” and another was the classic “If you were a road sign, what would you be and why?” It felt like they were testing how I reasoned out loud as much as what I knew. I also had another round with the potential manager and future teammates, which kept the same behavioral tone. My advice would be to go in with a few solid stories about times you improved a process, handled ambiguity, or worked on a relevant project, because they kept coming back to those themes. The process was straightforward overall, but it was more time-consuming than I expected, and I ended up not getting an offer. No offer red Be ready for a long, timed assessment before the interviews, and make sure you have a quiet place to take it. For the live rounds, prepare a few concrete stories about improving a workflow and explaining your thought process on oddball reasoning questions like the manhole-cover prompt.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Epic
Describing a data project and its challenges
| Question | |
|---|---|
| String Palindromes | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Button AB Test | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Size of Joins | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Target Indices | |
| Declining Applicants | |
| Implementing the Fibonacci Sequence in Three Different Methods | |
| Multicollinearity in Regression | |
| Customer Success vs. Free Trial | |
| Impossibly Iterative Fibonacci | |
| Type I and II Errors | |
| Stakeholder Communication | |
| Community Health Metrics | |
| Measuring Customer Service Quality | |
| Area Under the ROC Curve | |
| Data Cleaning Experiences | |
| User Journey Analysis | |
| Accessible Data | |
| Correlation in Regression | |
| Game Feature Home | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Cumulative Distribution |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Candidates submit a resume through Epic’s website and typically hear back quickly if selected to continue. The process starts with an early screening of background and fit before any live interviews.
Epic sends a fairly long assessment that feels more like a test session than a quick screen. It includes aptitude-style sections covering IQ, personality, and analytical thinking, and candidates should expect to need sustained focus.
After the assessment, candidates have an initial screening call before moving to the phone interview. The experience suggests this is a preliminary check to confirm interest and basic qualifications.
This round is conducted by phone without video and is mostly behavioral and experience-based. Interviewers ask candidates to walk through their background, relevant projects, interest in the role, why they want to work at Epic, and situational questions about problem-solving and workflow improvement.
Candidates then meet with the potential manager and future teammates. This round stays behavioral in tone and continues to focus on how the candidate thinks through ambiguity, improves processes, and explains their reasoning out loud.