Candidates describe Amazon PM-track interviews as behavioral-heavy, built on Leadership Principles and STAR stories with deep follow-ups. Loop length varies by report, and some add a case, SQL or a work simulation.
$165K
Avg. Base Comp
$297K
Avg. Total Comp
2-7 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Candidates describe the Amazon Product Manager interview as a Leadership Principles interview first and a product case second. Reports across PM and adjacent program-manager titles repeatedly mention STAR-format questions such as making a quick decision, persuading a stakeholder, going above and beyond for a customer, handling a failure, and managing conflict between teams. Several candidates say interviewers kept probing the same example, so a polished first answer was not enough. Some recommend having 10 or more distinct stories ready, because one story can be used up early in a long loop.
The format varies. Candidates mention a recruiter or HR screen, a hiring-manager video call, and a final loop that ranged from a few interviews to a full day of five or more. A bar raiser appears in some accounts. Other reports add an online assessment, a work simulation, a SQL question, a short product case, or an unexpected coding question, and one candidate who received an offer was asked about security and launch delivery. Treat these as possible variations, not guaranteed rounds.
Outcomes in the evidence are mixed, with several no-offer reports and some offers. Build a bank of stories with specific metrics, your individual contribution, and the customer impact. Also prepare to explain a system or project you owned and why you made your design choices, and to discuss how you use data.
Synthesized from 70 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Amazon process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Amazon
Write a query that returns all neighborhoods that have 0 users.
| Question | |
|---|---|
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Manager Team Sizes | |
| Upsell Transactions | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Longest Streak Users | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Button AB Test | |
| Monthly Customer Report | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Paired Products | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Pre-Launching Shows | |
| Download Facts | |
| Find the First Non-Repeating Character in a String | |
| Average Quantity | |
| Month Over Month | |
| Google Maps Improvement | |
| 7 Day Streak | |
| Swipe Precision | |
| Cumulative Reset | |
| Group Success | |
| Compute Deviation | |
| Always Excited Users |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Candidates typically report an initial recruiter or HR conversation covering background, motivation for the role, and logistics. One candidate also describes an online assessment before the screen. Expect questions like why Amazon and why this team, and prepare a concise introduction.
Several candidates describe a roughly hour-long video call with a hiring manager or senior product manager. Reports mention STAR questions, system or design-choice questions, and how candidates use data. One candidate reports a SQL self-rating question. Content may vary by team.
Some candidates report extra components: a work simulation, a short product or business case, an assignment, or a SQL question. One candidate reports a binary search coding question and ML discussion. These appear in individual accounts, so they may not apply to your loop.
Candidates report a longer loop of several interviews, with counts ranging from about five to seven in different accounts. Questions are typically STAR-based on conflict, failure, customer focus, and stakeholder influence, with repeated follow-ups. Some report a bar raiser in the loop.
Candidates report both offers and rejections, including rejection after the final round. Communication speed varied: one candidate reports updates within a couple of business days, while another says communication afterward was poor. Total timelines were not consistently reported, so plan for some uncertainty.
