RBC quant-track interviews reported by candidates combine Python/SQL screens, probability and finance math, markets questions, and behavioral rounds, sometimes ending in back-to-back superday calls.
$175K
Avg. Base Comp
$260K
Avg. Total Comp
2-6 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
The clearest quant-specific report describes a Quantitative Analyst loop with a first round split into thirty minutes of technical questions and thirty minutes of behavioral. The technical half leaned on contest-style statistics and combinatorics, including a Bayes' rule question. A second, purely technical round ran at least an hour and moved into interest rate risk and what to watch for when building a factor model. That candidate did not receive an offer.
Other quant-adjacent reports point to a different mix. A Markets Quantitative Summer Analyst candidate started with a Python and SQL assessment, then a phone screen with market questions, brain teasers and mental math, then three back-to-back final calls that were mostly behavioral and market-focused, including a question on who RBC's CEO is. A Quantitative Technology Services candidate reported behavioral and computer science concept questions with no live coding, tailored to the resume, and received an offer.
Several reports from neighboring RBC capital markets roles, such as trading and banking, show markets knowledge and fit carrying real weight. Those candidates mention current prices, rates, a defended trade idea and a clear answer for why RBC. Treat these as signals for markets-facing quant seats, not guaranteed quant questions.
For preparation, drill probability, Bayesian reasoning and risk basics, keep Python and SQL sharp for the screen, and follow current markets so you can speak to them in each conversation.
Synthesized from 15 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Rbc process.
After applying through the company website, I was invited to interview fairly quickly and had to select timeslots on Piazza, which was a streamlined way to coordinate. My first round was conducted by two full-time employees over Webex and lasted about thirty minutes. The conversation was heavily behavioral, anchored on resume experiences and what drew me to finance and RBC specifically. They asked about leadership moments, why I was interested in capital markets, and my take on what was happening in the markets at that time. One interviewer asked a hypothetical investment question—if I had a million dollars, how would I deploy it and why—which tested both my market intuition and decision-making rationale. The questions felt designed to see if I could think like an investor, not just recite facts. There were some lighter questions too: where I saw myself in five years, times I'd failed, and what culture meant to me. I learned that RBC puts genuine weight on cultural fit and understanding the kind of person they hire. They weren't looking for a scripted answer; they wanted authenticity paired with clear thinking about finance and markets. The interview felt more like a conversation than an interrogation, which made it easier to be genuine about my interests and background.
Prep tip from this candidate
Prepare specific, personal examples of leadership and teamwork that tie directly to your interest in capital markets—culture fit is heavily weighted. Also, develop a genuine investment thesis and stay current on one or two market stories you can discuss intelligently.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Rbc
Write a query to get the total three-day rolling average for deposits by day
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Size of Joins | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| MLE for Default Prediction | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Top 5 Turnover Risk | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| 500 Cards | |
| Maximum Profit | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Google Maps Improvement | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Assumptions of Linear Regression | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Slacking Employees Salaries | |
| Last Transaction | |
| Find the Missing Number | |
| Monthly Customer Report | |
| Cumulative Distribution | |
| Payments Received | |
| Duplicate Rows | |
| Sum to N | |
| Paired Products | |
| New Partner Card |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Candidates for markets-quant seats report starting with a Codility-style assessment mixing Python and SQL at a moderate level. One candidate described it as a screen rather than the main event. It may vary by team, and one technology-services candidate reported no live coding at all.
Candidates report a roughly 30-minute call with an analyst or trader mixing market questions, brain teasers, mental math and behavioral topics such as why RBC and why the role. Expect questions on current prices or market views, though the exact content likely depends on the desk.
One Quantitative Analyst candidate reported a one-hour first round split evenly between technical and behavioral questions. The technical half was contest-math style, covering statistics, combinatorics and Bayes' rule. Interviewers were described as friendly and conversational throughout.
The same candidate reported a second round of at least an hour that was purely technical. It covered interest rate risk and the issues to look for when constructing a factor model. This is a single report, so other quant teams may weight different topics, such as CS concepts or resume-based projects.
Several markets-oriented candidates describe a final stage of about three 30-minute interviews back to back, with MDs, desk heads or team members. Candidates report behavioral and market questions, sometimes a trade idea or technical walk-through. Outcomes were mixed, with some candidates receiving offers and others not.
