
Meta Data Scientist candidates report SQL and product-sense screens, followed in some processes by a four-round loop covering SQL, case analysis, statistics or probability, and behavioral discussion.
$160K
Avg. Base Comp
$320K
Avg. Total Comp
4–7 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Meta Data Scientist interview reports consistently emphasize applying analysis to product decisions. Several candidates describe a technical screen that combines SQL and product sense, sometimes using a shared scenario or dataset across both parts. Reported SQL work includes retention analysis, joins, subqueries, window functions, and multi-step query logic.
Product cases focus on evaluating features and interpreting trade-offs. Candidates describe discussing group calling, recommendation changes, and feed or Reels engagement. Start with the decision you need to make, then define a success metric, identify meaningful guardrails, and explain what result would change your recommendation. Experiment-design follow-ups can cover randomization, power, novelty effects, segmentation, and the implications of a declining guardrail metric. For social products, be prepared to discuss how interactions between users can complicate treatment-control comparisons.
Loop structure varies across accounts. Multiple candidates explicitly report four loop interviews, including SQL, behavioral discussion, and case-oriented or analytical conversations; statistics or probability may arise in the loop. Treat reported topic mixes as preparation signals rather than a fixed script. Clear assumptions, a structured approach, and concise reasoning are recurring themes across the accounts.
Synthesized from 49 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Meta process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Meta
Write a query that returns all neighborhoods that have 0 users.
| Question | |
|---|---|
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Liked Pages | |
| 500 Cards | |
| Last Transaction | |
| Session Difference | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Like Tracker | |
| Search Ratings | |
| Button AB Test | |
| Weighted Keys | |
| Flight Records | |
| Emails Opened | |
| Largest Salary by Department | |
| Swipe Precision | |
| Average Order Value | |
| Notification Deliveries | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Decreasing Comments | |
| Scrambled Tickets | |
| Recurring Character | |
| Longest Streak Users | |
| Impression Reach | |
| Bank Fraud Model | |
| Closed Accounts | |
| Lazy Raters |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Some candidates report a recruiter conversation before technical evaluation. These discussions covered background, location or available roles, and whether to continue in the process. The specific content and whether this step occurs can vary by candidate and role.
Several reports describe an initial technical screen that combines SQL and product sense. Candidates encountered query problems alongside questions about metrics, feature evaluation, or experiment design; in some accounts, both portions used the same scenario or dataset.
Multiple candidates explicitly report a four-round loop. Reported components include SQL, behavioral discussion, product or case analysis, and statistics or probability. The exact mix differs across accounts, so prepare to explain both analytical reasoning and product decisions clearly.