Cisco Software Engineer interviews often open with an online coding or fundamentals assessment, then move into resume-heavy technical rounds, a behavioral or managerial conversation, and a final stage that ranges from a short call to a multi-person panel.
$144K
Avg. Base Comp
$172K
Avg. Total Comp
3-5 rounds
Typical Rounds
1-4 weeks
Process Length
Cisco Software Engineer interviews vary considerably by team, but a few patterns show up across many candidate reports. Many processes open with an online assessment — commonly one to three LeetCode-style coding questions at an easy-to-medium level, sometimes paired with multiple-choice questions on data structures, operating systems, networking, or databases. At least one candidate was rejected directly from this screen within about a week, without ever reaching a live interview, so it functions as a genuine filter rather than a formality.
From there, the loop typically includes a recruiter or HR conversation about motivation and fit, one or two technical rounds built around a deep walkthrough of the candidate's resume and personal projects plus live coding, and often a managerial or behavioral round focused on what the candidate personally contributed and how they made design decisions. Operating-system and networking fundamentals — TCP/IP, DHCP, VLANs, stack-versus-heap memory, sockets — come up repeatedly in these general software-engineering loops, so it's worth reviewing core CS fundamentals alongside coding practice.
Round counts and closing formats differ by team: several candidates completed three to five rounds end to end, while a few processes ended abruptly after a single HR call or after the first technical round. One candidate's loop closed with a five-round panel that included a manager, two developers, and a director; another's final stage was a four-person panel where only one interviewer actually spoke. A more recent report described a take-home built with AI coding agents, reviewed afterward for genuine understanding of the generated code rather than raw output — a sign that at least some teams are experimenting with newer formats. Given this spread, candidates should prepare for both a lean, resume-and-coding loop and a longer, multi-round process depending on the team.
Synthesized from 60 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Cisco process.
After hearing from HR on LinkedIn, I went in for an on-site interview where I met with several team members across multiple rounds. The process itself was straightforward—Cisco frames it as efficient and quick, which I appreciated given how much time interviewing can eat up. The interview spanned roughly 3 to 5 weeks total, broken into distinct stages. There was an initial recruiter screen focused on my resume and background, followed by an online assessment on HackerRank that included two DSA coding problems along with MCQs covering networking, OS, and CS fundamentals—that chunk ran about 70 to 90 minutes. The technical screening came next as a live video call, around 45 to 60 minutes, where they focused on live coding and system basics. What struck me most was the on-site loop itself. I went through several rounds: a deep-dive DSA problem, a system or network design problem testing LLD/HLD thinking, and a managerial round where they dug into how I'd approached projects and made architecture decisions. One question that came up was the classic "what happens when you press google.com"—a deceptively simple prompt that actually requires you to walk through DNS, networking stacks, browser behavior, and more. The questions were mostly C and Linux focused, which aligned with the role. There was also an HR round at the end with behavioral STAR questions and discussion around culture fit and compensation. Overall, the process was well-structured and felt intentional about what they were testing at each stage, though the bar was high across the board.
Prep tip from this candidate
Brush up on C and Linux fundamentals—they'll come up throughout multiple rounds. For the HackerRank assessment, expect two DSA problems plus CS fundamentals MCQs on networking and OS concepts. Be ready to walk through systems-level questions like DNS and browser behavior in detail, not just surface-level answers.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Cisco
Select the 2nd highest salary in the engineering department
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Get Top N Frequent Words | |
| Cyclic Detection | |
| Closed Accounts | |
| Sort Strings | |
| Precision and Recall | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Cloud-Agnostic Deployments | |
| String Palindromes | |
| Deciding Between Solutions | |
| VLAN 2 Connectivity Issue | |
| Testing Constraints | |
| Relational Migration | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Justify a Neural Network | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Prime to N | |
| Over-Budget Projects | |
| The Brackets Problem | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Find Duplicate Numbers in a List | |
| Swapping Nodes | |
| CNNs vs Intensity-Based Features | |
| Append Frequency | |
| Groups of Anagrams | |
| Longest Increasing Subsequence | |
| Skyscanner Partner ETL | |
| Valid Anagram |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Many candidates report an online assessment soon after applying, often before any live conversation. Formats vary: some saw two to three LeetCode-style coding questions at an easy-to-medium level — in one case with hidden test cases on the final question — while others paired a single DSA question with a large set of multiple-choice questions covering data structures, operating systems, networking, and databases. One candidate was rejected within about a week of submitting the assessment, without ever reaching a live interview, so treat this stage as a real filter rather than a formality.
Most reports include a recruiter or HR call focused on why the candidate wants to join Cisco, resume confirmation, location, and timing. For one candidate applying to a Meraki Sydney role, this single phone screen was the entire process — a rejection followed with no technical round at all. For most others, this call is simply the entry point into a longer technical loop, so a short first call doesn't reliably predict a short overall process.
Technical rounds typically combine a detailed walkthrough of the candidate's resume and personal projects with live coding at an easy-to-medium difficulty — string manipulation, linked lists, stacks, or graph problems — plus core CS fundamentals such as OOP, C/C++, operating systems, and networking basics like TCP/IP, DHCP, and VLANs. One candidate's team focused instead on Java concurrency, including a producer-consumer problem and designing an executor service, despite being told to expect system design, so questions can diverge from what recruiters preview.
Several candidates describe a managerial or behavioral round that revisits their projects and asks specifically what they personally contributed and how they made design or architecture decisions. Teamwork, extracurriculars, and situational questions also come up here. Interviewers appear to weigh clear communication about past work about as heavily as raw problem-solving speed, and one candidate was asked to run code they had only sketched as pseudocode, which didn't go smoothly.
The closing stage differs sharply across reports. Some candidates faced a brief 10-15 minute check on relocation and logistics; one completed a five-round loop that ended with a panel including a manager, two developers, and a director; another's final round was a four-person panel where only one interviewer actually spoke. A more recent report described a three-hour take-home built using AI coding agents followed by a review focused on whether the candidate understood the generated code, suggesting some teams are testing newer formats. Prepare for anything from a short formality to a multi-person evaluation.
