Cisco Software Engineer candidates report a team-dependent process that can combine an assessment, resume and project discussion, coding, CS fundamentals, and manager or HR conversations.
$165K
Avg. Base Comp
$204K
Avg. Total Comp
3-4 rounds
Typical Rounds
3-4 weeks
Process Length
Cisco Software Engineer interviews reported here vary by team and hiring route, but the strongest recurring themes are project depth, coding, core computer-science knowledge, and team fit. One recruiter-sourced candidate skipped the online assessment, then completed resume and fundamentals discussions, a coding interview, and a manager conversation. A new-graduate candidate described two back-to-back hiring-manager conversations centered on a resume deep dive, plus a separate technical screen.
Live coding examples include detecting a cycle in a linked list and an easy-to-medium string-manipulation problem. Practice writing runnable code and narrating tradeoffs, including complexity, edge cases, and why the chosen data structure fits the problem. Candidates should also be ready to explain personal projects precisely: clarify the problem, their individual contribution, important technical decisions, and what they would change.
The technical emphasis can depend heavily on the team. One software-engineering candidate encountered connectivity, 5G, TCP/IP, routers, access-control lists, switching, stacks, trees, and matrix problems, while another was asked about dynamic programming and general CS fundamentals. Later manager or team conversations may assess strengths, weaknesses, motivation for Cisco, and prospective contribution. One candidate reported a process lasting about a month, but the supplied accounts do not establish a universal duration or round count.
Synthesized from 19 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Cisco process.
The online assessment was the toughest part of my Cisco process. It combined two medium-to-hard coding questions with written-response questions, plus multiple-choice coverage of data structures, operating systems, computer networks, and DBMS. The coding portion felt fairly time-pressured because the questions were not straightforward, and the breadth of the non-coding material meant it was not enough to prepare only for algorithms.
The interview itself was much more conversational than I expected. The interviewers spent a lot of time walking through my resume and projects, and the discussion even ran over. I was asked why I wanted to work for Cisco, to describe problems I had solved in my current work, and to discuss an adjacency-list concept. The main thing they seemed to look for was whether I could explain my thought process and defend project design decisions clearly.
For the technical discussion, there was also emphasis on Python, automation, test-case writing, creating models, and basic networking. The networking questions went beyond definitions into troubleshooting and debugging scenarios, so being able to reason through a problem mattered. I came away feeling positive about the conversation, but I was rejected after the first round and did not receive an offer. I would focus your preparation on communicating your project decisions, Python automation, and networking debugging—not just coding practice.
Prep tip from this candidate
Prepare to explain your projects' design decisions and problems you solved, then drill Python automation and networking troubleshooting scenarios. The assessment also covered DS, OS, computer networks, and DBMS alongside two medium-hard coding questions.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Cisco
Select the 2nd highest salary in the engineering department
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Get Top N Frequent Words | |
| Cyclic Detection | |
| Closed Accounts | |
| Sort Strings | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Cloud-Agnostic Deployments | |
| String Palindromes | |
| Deciding Between Solutions | |
| VLAN 2 Connectivity Issue | |
| Testing Constraints | |
| Relational Migration | |
| Why Do You Want to Work With Us | |
| Justify a Neural Network | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| Prime to N | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Over-Budget Projects | |
| The Brackets Problem | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Swapping Nodes | |
| Append Frequency | |
| Groups of Anagrams | |
| Longest Increasing Subsequence | |
| Find Duplicate Numbers in a List | |
| CNNs vs Intensity-Based Features | |
| Target Indices | |
| Success Measurement | |
| Swap Variables |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Some candidates report an assessment before live interviews, ranging from two coding questions to coding plus multiple-choice questions on areas such as data structures, operating systems, networking, and databases. Other candidates report beginning with a recruiter conversation instead, so the initial screen may depend on the hiring route and team.
Candidates report recruiter calls that cover role fit, motivation, location or timing, and a high-level resume walkthrough. One recent candidate reported skipping the OA after recruiter outreach, while another described a recruiter-first path followed by technical and hiring-manager conversations.
Candidates report live coding alongside discussion of their resume and projects. Reported examples include linked-list cycle detection, 2-sum, graph problems, string manipulation, and dynamic programming. Depending on the team, technical discussion may also include networking, operating systems, SQL, or Java concurrency.
Later conversations may combine behavioral questions with project deep dives or technical follow-ups. Candidates report being asked about contributions, architecture decisions, teamwork, relocation, and role fit; the final stage is not described consistently across teams.
