
Bnsf Railway Data Engineer interview typically runs 3 rounds: online assessment, technical round, and behavioral loop. The process takes about 60 days and is somewhat scattered, with scheduling affected by holidays.
$117K
Avg. Base Comp
$201K
Avg. Total Comp
3
Typical Rounds
60 days
Process Length
Our candidates report that BNSF Railway is looking for data engineers who can operate close to the platform, not just write clean Python. The clearest signal came from the assessment itself: instead of classic algorithm work, it leaned into PySpark, YAML, and Kubernetes-style configuration, which tells us the team values engineers who can move between data processing and infrastructure concerns without friction. That mismatch between the posting and the actual test was the biggest surprise for the candidate, and it’s a pattern we pay attention to because it usually means the day-to-day role is more production-oriented than the title suggests.
We’ve also seen that BNSF cares about how you think through systems, not just whether you can solve a prompt quickly. In the technical conversation, the questions centered on current work, technical depth, and a system design discussion that felt like an architecture review. That lines up with the behavioral feedback too: candidates were asked to explain disagreements with senior teammates and to translate a technical strength into plain English. The non-obvious bar here is practical judgment under real-world constraints—being able to justify design choices, communicate them clearly, and show you’ve built things that would survive in a logistics environment where reliability matters.
Synthetized from 1 candidates reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Bnsf Railway process.
I liked the process overall, even though it was a little more scattered than I expected. The first step was an online assessment on Codility that mixed Python and YAML, and I was given training examples plus about a week and a half to complete it. I had gone in expecting Python algorithms, but the actual test leaned more toward PySpark and infrastructure-style work. One question asked me to use PySpark to read a CSV, do a simple aggregation, and return the result as a dict. Another asked me to write a Kubernetes configuration in YAML based on provided specs. The assessment itself took about an hour, and the hardest part was really the mismatch between the job posting and what showed up in the test, not the difficulty of the coding.
After that, I moved into a technical round where they asked about my current project, my technical skills, and one system design question. That part felt more like a conversation about how I think through architecture and what I’ve actually built, rather than a pure coding screen. In the full-day loop, there were also behavioral rounds, including questions like a time I disagreed with a senior team member and explaining one of my technical strengths in a non-technical way. The recruiter was informative and responsive throughout, and the whole process stretched to around 60 days, which seemed pretty normal given the holiday timing and scheduling. I didn’t get an offer, but the process was clear enough once it got going. My main takeaway is to prep specifically for PySpark and YAML/Kubernetes-style tasks, not just generic Python interview problems, and be ready to talk through project architecture and system design at a high level.
Prep tip from this candidate
Focus on PySpark coding tasks like reading a CSV, doing a simple aggregation, and returning structured output, plus YAML/Kubernetes configuration writing. Also be ready to discuss your current project architecture and answer a basic system design question clearly.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Bnsf Railway
Write a query that returns all neighborhoods that have 0 users.
| Question | |
|---|---|
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Download Facts | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Average Quantity | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Manager Team Sizes | |
| Month Over Month | |
| Flight Records | |
| Prime to N | |
| Paired Products | |
| Upsell Transactions | |
| Monthly Customer Report | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Recurring Character | |
| Address Schema | |
| Retailer Data Warehouse | |
| Cumulative Sales Since Last Restocking | |
| Permutation Palindrome | |
| Completed Shipments | |
| Largest Wireless Packages | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Level Of Rain Water In 2D Terrain |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
The process starts with a Codility assessment that includes Python and YAML tasks. Candidates are given training examples and about a week and a half to complete it, with questions focused more on PySpark and infrastructure-style work than on generic Python algorithms.
Next is a technical conversation about the candidate’s current project, technical skills, and a system design question. This round is more discussion-based and evaluates how the candidate thinks through architecture and what they have built in practice.
The later stage is a full-day loop that includes behavioral interviews. Candidates are asked about past disagreements with senior team members and to explain a technical strength in non-technical terms, alongside additional conversations that assess fit and communication.