
Nine candidate reports describe an Epam Systems Data Engineer process most often built around SQL, Python, and Spark/PySpark technical rounds, though a few loops swap in Hadoop, Java, or Azure Data Factory instead, with some adding AWS/GCP, pipeline design, and a separate managerial or client round.
$138K
Avg. Base Comp
$173K
Avg. Total Comp
Not reported
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Across these candidate accounts, the most commonly reported technical topics in the Epam Systems Data Engineer process are SQL, Python, and Spark/PySpark, but the mix is not universal. Candidates describe live coding on SQL joins and window functions alongside medium-difficulty Python problems, with an expectation that you actually write code rather than talk through it. Spark questions, when present, go beyond syntax. Candidates report questions on:
Not every loop hits all three core topics. One Senior Bigdata Engineer candidate was tested on SQL and Python but also faced Hadoop, GCP, Java, and even UI-testing questions. Another Data Engineer candidate's technical round centered on SQL, Python, scalable pipeline design with real-time processing, and Azure Data Factory scenarios, with no Spark questions reported. Cloud exposure varies too. Some candidates faced Azure Data Factory and Databricks questions, others AWS or GCP, and one was asked to compare Parquet, Avro, CSV, and Delta.
Structure also varies. Some candidates describe an HR screen followed by one or two technical rounds. Others add an online coding test, a managerial round, or a customer-facing conversation. One recurring theme stands out. One candidate who cleared two rigorous technical rounds was rejected in a 20-minute managerial round, and another heard nothing back after being told they had passed every round. A strong technical performance alone does not guarantee progression.
When preparing for this role, expect:
Synthesized from 9 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Epam Systems process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Epam Systems
Create top_ads with the top 3 ads and return the row counts for inner, left, right, and cross joins with ads
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Level Of Rain Water In 2D Terrain | |
| Classification and Regression | |
| Weighted Average Sales | |
| Best DAU | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| Download Facts | |
| Cumulative Distribution | |
| Prime to N | |
| Manager Team Sizes | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Find the Missing Number | |
| Largest Salary by Department | |
| String Shift | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Average Quantity | |
| Paired Products | |
| Find the First Non-Repeating Character in a String | |
| Last Transaction | |
| Retailer Data Warehouse |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Several candidates report an initial recruiter or HR conversation covering background, reason for the job change, and EPAM's working environment. One candidate also faced basic Python fundamentals here, such as PEP 8 and immutable data types. This stage is typically described as professional. However, one candidate reported that the role being discussed changed three times during the call, so confirm the exact role and tech stack upfront. One candidate also took a one-hour online coding test before the technical rounds.
The most frequently reported stage combines SQL (joins, window functions) with live Python coding. In many loops it also covers Spark/PySpark topics such as Spark architecture, query execution, dataset versus dataframe, and optimization. Not every loop matches this exactly. One Senior Bigdata Engineer candidate's rounds shifted into Hadoop, GCP, and unrelated Java and UI-testing questions. A separate Data Engineer loop centered on SQL, Python, and Azure Data Factory scenarios with no Spark questions reported. Some candidates also faced storage-format comparisons such as Parquet, Avro, CSV, and Delta, or a Scala Spark optimization problem.
Some candidates describe a second technical round covering cloud tools such as Azure Data Factory, Databricks, and AWS. It can also include cloud storage and authentication types, data warehousing, and PySpark coding scenarios with real time pressure. One candidate had two back-to-back 90-minute technical rounds. Another also went through a separate customer-facing round, though no details of its content were reported.
A managerial round follows the technical stages in several accounts, and it can carry real weight. One candidate who had cleared two rigorous technical rounds was rejected after a 20-minute managerial conversation with 'technically unfit' feedback that even HR found surprising. Another candidate described the managerial interviewer pushing for a Jenkins-based CI/CD explanation after they described an Azure DevOps and Databricks setup. Treat this stage as a real evaluation point, not a formality.
Outcome communication is inconsistent across reports. One candidate received an offer after a well-structured process. Others describe no feedback after technical rounds, or long silences after being told they passed, including one case where the role had reportedly already been filled. Set a follow-up expectation early rather than assuming silence means a pending offer.