Hungryroot software engineer interviews reported by candidates start with a recruiter call, then a timed coding round with LeetCode-style problems and SQL. Longer loops may add further coding and architecture discussions.
$172K
Avg. Base Comp
$210K
Avg. Total Comp
5-8 rounds
Typical Rounds
Not reported
Process Length
Hungryroot's software engineer interviews, as candidates describe them, lean on timed algorithmic coding after a recruiter call. One senior candidate in mid-2024 faced three back-to-back questions on a CoderPad-style setup: two LeetCode-style problems (a pivot index with equal left and right sums, and the Luhn algorithm) plus a basic SQL question with SELECT, WHERE and a simple JOIN. That candidate was told advancing usually means getting two of the three right, and was told to expect 7 or 8 rounds in total, including further coding and architecture conversations with the CTO.
A full stack candidate described a different shape: a phone screen, a second round with an introductory question about a current project and its technologies, then a coding exercise. That candidate ran out of time on the first coding question and was rejected a few days later. They described five rounds across nearly a month and found interviewers friendly.
A senior front end candidate reported only a recruiter screen, with motivation and background questions and no technical content, followed by a rejection.
The practical takeaway is to practice array and number problems against a clock, keep SQL joins sharp, and prepare a clear walkthrough of a recent project. Only three candidates are reported here, so round counts and formats may vary by level and team.
Synthesized from 3 candidate reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Hungryroot process.
I got a rejection email a few days after my coding exercise, and I'm fairly sure the time I took on it was the reason. The process began with a phone screen that went well enough that they moved me straight into the second round. That round opened with some introductory questions, including one asking me to describe a project from my current job and the technologies I used. Then came the coding exercise, and that's where I struggled. I'm still building comfort with LeetCode-style problems, and I took far too long to reach an answer, so the time ran out during the first coding question. I assume more assessments would have followed, since the process ran five rounds across nearly a month, but I never got to see them.
What stood out most was how friendly everyone was. Nobody made me feel rushed or judged, and the company came across as a good place to work. The pace was the part that surprised me. Almost a month of interviews is a long commitment, and it made the rejection hit harder because I had put so much time into it.
If I were going in again, I'd spend my prep time on timed coding problems instead of untimed practice, since the exercise ran on a clock and that's where I lost ground.
Prep tip from this candidate
The coding exercise was timed and the candidate ran out of time on the first question, so practice LeetCode-style problems under a strict clock rather than untimed. Expect the process to run several rounds over several weeks.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Hungryroot
Select the 2nd highest salary in the engineering department
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Monthly Customer Report | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Prime to N | |
| String Shift | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Upsell Transactions | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Flight Records | |
| Delivery Estimate Model | |
| Raining in Seattle | |
| Over-Budget Projects | |
| Find the First Non-Repeating Character in a String | |
| Google Maps Improvement | |
| Daily Retention Summary | |
| Over 100 Dollars | |
| Recurring Character | |
| Scrambled Tickets | |
| Completed Shipments | |
| SELECTive Wine Connoisseur | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| P-value to a Layman |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
Candidates report an initial call where the recruiter explains the company and role and asks about work history and motivation. One senior front end candidate reported no technical questions at this stage. Prepare a concise story of your background and why you want the role.
One full stack candidate reports that after a successful phone screen the second round opened with introductory questions, including describing a project from their current job and the technologies used. Be ready to explain your recent work clearly, since this may precede coding.
Candidates report a timed virtual coding exercise. A senior candidate described three questions: a pivot index problem, the Luhn algorithm, and a basic SQL query with a simple JOIN. A full stack candidate ran out of time on the first question. Practice under a strict clock.
One senior candidate was told to expect 7 or 8 rounds in total, with virtual onsites including another coding exercise and architecture discussions with the CTO. A full stack candidate described five rounds over nearly a month. Counts may vary, so confirm the loop with your recruiter.
