Analysis Group Data Analyst interview typically runs 2 rounds: a 30-minute virtual first round and an in-office super day with six interviews. The process usually takes about 1-2 weeks and is detail-heavy, with pointed follow-ups.
$110K
Avg. Base Comp
$213K
Avg. Total Comp
2
Typical Rounds
1-2 weeks
Process Length
We've seen Analysis Group lean hard on depth over polish. One candidate said the hardest part was not the difficulty of the questions, but how detailed every answer needed to be. That shows up in the way they probe project work: they don’t stop at a high-level summary, and they keep pushing until they understand the reasoning, the technical choices, and how the analysis was actually done. For a Data Analyst, that means the bar is less about sounding impressive and more about being able to walk someone through your work in a way that holds up under pointed follow-ups.
A recurring theme is that Analysis Group seems to care a lot about whether candidates can translate technical work into plain language. Our candidates report being asked how they would communicate complex economic ideas to non-technical audiences, alongside questions about data cleaning, economic research, and teamwork. That combination tells us they’re looking for people who can operate in a consulting environment where clarity matters as much as analysis. The strongest candidates are the ones who can explain not just what they did, but why it mattered and how they would make it understandable to a client or colleague.
We also see a very specific fit signal: they want a convincing, grounded answer for why economics consulting and why Analysis Group. The atmosphere may be friendly, but the follow-ups are pointed, so vague enthusiasm doesn’t go far. Candidates who did best came in with concrete examples of juggling priorities, collaborating across teams, and handling detailed project discussions without losing the thread. In other words, they’re screening for analytical maturity and communication discipline, not just general interest in consulting.
Synthetized from 1 candidates reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Analysis Group process.
The hardest part for me was how detailed they wanted every answer to be, even though the process itself wasn’t especially difficult. I started with a 30-minute virtual first round with two employees, and it was mostly behavioral and fit-focused. They spent a lot of time on my background, my interest in Analysis Group, and why I wanted economics consulting in general. I was also asked to talk through one data project I had done, and they really wanted me to explain the technical details clearly rather than just give a high-level summary. That theme came up again later when they asked how I would communicate complex economic ideas to other people, so it felt like they were testing whether I could make technical work understandable to a non-technical audience.
After that came a super day at the office, which was much longer and had six interviews with different people across the organization. That round was still mostly behavioral, but it covered a lot of standard econ consulting topics like why AG, why economics consulting, my experience with data analysis, data cleaning, and economic research. There were also a lot of questions about teamwork and multitasking, so I made sure to have examples ready where I had to juggle competing priorities. The people were all very nice and the atmosphere was friendly, but they did ask very pointed follow-ups, so I wouldn’t go in assuming it’s casual just because it’s not a hard technical screen. My takeaway is that you should be ready to discuss your projects in detail, explain your reasoning step by step, and have a strong answer for why you want AG specifically.
Prep tip from this candidate
Prepare a concise but detailed walkthrough of one data project, including the technical choices you made and how you explained them to others. Also rehearse clear answers to why AG and why economics consulting, since those came up in both the first round and the superday.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Analysis Group
Select the 2nd highest salary in the engineering department
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Employee Salaries | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| First Touch Attribution | |
| Largest Salary by Department | |
| Experiment Validity | |
| First to Six | |
| Prime to N | |
| Raining in Seattle | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| 500 Cards | |
| Find the Missing Number | |
| Over-Budget Projects | |
| Size of Joins | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Swipe Precision | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Project Budget Error | |
| Encoding Categorical Features | |
| Top 3 Users | |
| Impression Reach | |
| Longest Streak Users | |
| Bank Fraud Model | |
| Lazy Raters | |
| SELECTive Wine Connoisseur | |
| Manager Team Sizes | |
| Get Top N Frequent Words | |
| Find Duplicate Numbers in a List |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
A 30-minute virtual interview with two employees that focused on behavioral and fit questions. They spent time on the candidate’s background, interest in Analysis Group, and motivation for economics consulting, while also asking for a detailed walkthrough of one data project and the technical reasoning behind it.
Within the initial interview, the candidate was pushed to explain a past data project in detail rather than at a high level. The interviewers wanted clear, step-by-step explanations of the technical work and how the candidate would communicate complex economic ideas to a non-technical audience.
An in-office super day with six interviews across different people in the organization. The conversations were still mostly behavioral, but they covered why Analysis Group, why economics consulting, data analysis, data cleaning, economic research, teamwork, multitasking, and pointed follow-up questions throughout.
The final stage appeared to be the cumulative assessment from the super day, where interviewers evaluated how well the candidate handled detailed follow-ups and explained their work. The process emphasized clarity, depth, and the ability to make technical or economic concepts understandable to others.