Abnormal Security Software Engineer interview typically runs 4 rounds: recruiter screen, OA, technical screen, hiring manager. Timeline is a few calls over several weeks, with a notably candid and structured process.
$141K
Avg. Base Comp
$156K
Avg. Total Comp
4-5
Typical Rounds
2-4 weeks
Process Length
Our candidates report a company that cares less about polished performance and more about whether you can communicate clearly under pressure. A recurring theme is the contrast between the two experiences: one candidate described a rigid, yes-or-no screening style and a technical round that felt almost one-sided, while another said the process was candid, upfront, and explicitly framed around mutual fit. That tells us Abnormal is sensitive to signal quality early — they want to quickly separate people who can stay crisp and direct from those who need a lot of interviewer hand-holding.
What stands out most is how much weight they seem to place on ownership of the conversation. In the technical round, one candidate felt the interviewer stayed mostly silent, which means candidates who wait for heavy prompting may struggle. By contrast, the accepted candidate noted that the hiring manager clearly explained what each person would evaluate and invited questions early. We’ve seen that this company responds well to people who can narrate their thinking, connect past work to real outcomes, and make the discussion feel collaborative even when the interviewer is reserved.
The other non-obvious pattern is that Abnormal appears to reward straightforwardness over theatrics. The strongest feedback came from the candidate who said the process felt like a real conversation and that the team valued honesty throughout. That suggests the bar is not just technical competence, but whether your communication style feels calm, direct, and trustworthy — especially in a cybersecurity context where precision matters.
Synthetized from 2 candidates reports by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Abnormal Security process.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Abnormal Security
Select the 2nd highest salary in the engineering department
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Empty Neighborhoods | |
| Top Three Salaries | |
| Merge Sorted Lists | |
| Subscription Overlap | |
| Rolling Bank Transactions | |
| Customer Orders | |
| Comments Histogram | |
| String Shift | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| Closest SAT Scores | |
| Prime to N | |
| Upsell Transactions | |
| Monthly Customer Report | |
| First Touch Attribution | |
| Raining in Seattle | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Minimum Change | |
| Cyclic Detection | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Address Schema | |
| Download Facts | |
| Google Maps Improvement | |
| Longest Increasing Subsequence | |
| Permutation Palindrome | |
| Radix Addition | |
| Delivery Estimate Model | |
| Average Quantity | |
| Top 3 Users |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
The process often begins with a recruiter call that can feel like a rapid-fire screening. Candidates reported a series of direct yes-or-no questions, and in at least one case the call was recorded by a Zoom bot.
Some candidates, especially at more senior levels, had a few candid conversations before the formal loop started. These calls were used to confirm mutual fit and to clarify what the process would look like, including who would be involved and what each interviewer would evaluate.
After the initial screen, candidates may be given an online assessment before moving on to the technical interview. One experience specifically mentioned an OA as the next step after the recruiter call.
The technical round is described as a live coding session where the interviewer mostly watches while the candidate codes. It can feel fairly passive, with limited back-and-forth or guidance, so candidates may need to drive the explanation themselves.
This round is a more traditional conversation focused on resume deep-dives, past work, and projects. Candidates described it as the most normal and conversational part of the process, with behavioral questions about experience, leadership, and fit.