Research square Software Engineer Interview Guide

Getting ready for a Software Engineer interview at Research Square? The Research Square Software Engineer interview process typically spans 2–3 question topics and evaluates skills in areas like coding fundamentals, system design, and real-world problem solving. Interview preparation is especially important for this role at Research Square, as candidates are often asked to demonstrate their approach to building scalable software solutions and communicate their thought process in collaborative scenarios. The company values clear, practical engineering and the ability to translate technical concepts into impactful products that support researchers and academic publishing.

In preparing for the interview, you should:

• Understand the core skills necessary for Software Engineer positions at Research Square.
• Gain insights into Research Square’s Software Engineer interview structure and process.
• Practice real Research Square Software Engineer interview questions to sharpen your performance.

At Interview Query, we regularly analyze interview experience data shared by candidates. This guide uses that data to provide an overview of the Research Square Software Engineer interview process, along with sample questions and preparation tips tailored to help you succeed.

Research Square is a for-benefit company dedicated to making research publishing faster, fairer, and more accessible. The company provides a range of innovative solutions to help researchers effectively communicate their work, including author services such as language editing, formatting, translation, and figure preparation, as well as video abstracts to broaden the reach of published research. Research Square also offers tools for publishers, such as editorial checks, to streamline the submission process. As a Software Engineer, you will contribute to building and maintaining these platforms, directly supporting the mission to improve how research discoveries are shared globally.

As a Software Engineer at Research Square, you will be responsible for designing, developing, and maintaining software solutions that support the company’s mission to advance scholarly communication. You will work closely with cross-functional teams, including product managers and designers, to build scalable web applications and tools for researchers and publishers. Key responsibilities include writing clean, efficient code, participating in code reviews, troubleshooting technical issues, and contributing to the continuous improvement of the platform. This role is central to enhancing Research Square’s digital services, ensuring reliability, usability, and a seamless experience for academic users.

2.1 Stage 1: Application & Resume Review

The process begins with an online application and resume submission, where the focus is on evaluating your foundational software engineering skills, relevant project experience, and alignment with the company’s values and mission. The review is typically conducted by a recruiter or a member of the engineering team, who looks for evidence of core programming abilities, system design exposure, and collaborative work on technical projects. To prepare, ensure your resume clearly highlights your experience with algorithms, data structures, and any notable system design or web application projects.

2.2 Stage 2: Recruiter Screen

If your application is shortlisted, you will be contacted for a brief recruiter screen. This call generally lasts 20–30 minutes and is designed to assess your communication skills, motivation for applying, and overall fit for the company culture. The recruiter may touch on your technical background and clarify details from your resume. Preparation should include a concise summary of your experience, clear articulation of your interest in Research Square, and readiness to discuss your technical journey and career goals.

2.3 Stage 3: Technical/Case/Skills Round

This stage typically involves a practical coding challenge or technical assessment, often provided shortly after the recruiter screen. The assessment is designed to evaluate your problem-solving skills, coding proficiency, and ability to reason through software engineering scenarios. You may encounter algorithmic challenges (such as shortest path or Tower of Hanoi problems), as well as system design walkthroughs (like building a basic Twitter clone or designing a feature for a digital classroom). The challenge is usually take-home, allowing you to demonstrate clean code, logical structuring, and thoughtful test cases. Prepare by practicing clear, well-documented solutions and reviewing core computer science concepts.

2.4 Stage 4: Behavioral Interview

Candidates who perform well on the technical assessment are invited to a behavioral interview, often with a senior engineer or team lead. This round emphasizes your approach to teamwork, communication with stakeholders, and adaptability in collaborative environments. Expect to discuss previous projects, how you’ve overcome technical hurdles, and times you’ve exceeded expectations or resolved misaligned requirements. Preparation should focus on structuring responses with the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) and reflecting on experiences that showcase your growth mindset and ability to work cross-functionally.

2.5 Stage 5: Final/Onsite Round

The final stage may be a comprehensive virtual onsite or in-person interview with multiple team members, including senior engineers and engineering managers. This round typically combines technical deep-dives, whiteboard problem solving, and further behavioral questions. You may be asked to walk through code, explain your reasoning in system design scenarios, and demonstrate your ability to communicate technical concepts clearly. To prepare, review previous projects, be ready to discuss trade-offs in technical decisions, and practice articulating your thought process for open-ended engineering challenges.

2.6 Stage 6: Offer & Negotiation

After successfully navigating the interviews, you’ll enter the offer and negotiation phase with the recruiter or HR representative. This stage covers compensation, benefits, start date, and any final logistical details. Preparation involves researching industry standards, clarifying your priorities, and being ready to discuss your expectations confidently and professionally.

2.7 Average Timeline

The typical interview process for a Software Engineer at Research Square spans approximately 2–4 weeks from application to offer. Fast-track candidates—those with strong alignment to the company’s technical stack and immediate availability—may complete the process in as little as 1–2 weeks, while the standard pace allows for scheduling flexibility between rounds. Take-home assessments generally have a set deadline of a few days, and the final onsite is scheduled based on mutual availability.

Next, let’s explore the types of interview questions you can expect at each stage of the Research Square Software Engineer process.

3.1 Algorithms & Data Structures

For Software Engineer roles at Research Square, expect questions that test your ability to solve problems using efficient algorithms and data structures. These often require you to demonstrate clear logic, optimal time and space complexity, and an understanding of how data flows through systems.

3.1.1 The task is to implement a shortest path algorithm (like Dijkstra's or Bellman-Ford) to find the shortest path from a start node to an end node in a given graph. The graph is represented as a 2D array where each cell represents a node and the value in the cell represents the cost to traverse to that node.
Structure your answer by explaining your choice of algorithm, how you handle edge cases, and how you optimize for performance. Walk through the logic step-by-step and clarify your approach to traversing the graph.

3.1.2 Determine the minimum number of time steps required to get from the northwest corner to the southeast corner of a rectangular building.
Discuss how you would model the building as a grid, use BFS or DFS to explore possible paths, and account for obstacles or movement constraints.

3.1.3 Create your own algorithm for the popular children's game, "Tower of Hanoi".
Explain the recursive approach, define the base and recursive cases, and discuss the time complexity. Be clear about how you would translate this logic into code.

3.1.4 Calculate the minimum number of moves to reach a given value in the game 2048.
Describe how you would model the game state, simulate possible moves, and use search algorithms to find the optimal path to the target value.

3.1.5 Determine the full path of the robot before it hits the final destination or starts repeating the path.
Outline your approach to tracking the robot’s position, detecting cycles, and ensuring termination conditions are met.

3.2 System Design & Scalability

System design questions evaluate your ability to architect robust, scalable, and maintainable solutions. At Research Square, you may be asked to design systems that handle large data volumes, support analytics, or power digital products.

3.2.1 System design for a digital classroom service.
Break down the system into major components, discuss how you would handle user management, data storage, real-time updates, and scalability.

3.2.2 Design a data warehouse for a new online retailer.
Describe your approach to schema design, data ingestion, ETL processes, and how you would ensure query performance and data integrity.

3.2.3 Designing a dynamic sales dashboard to track McDonald's branch performance in real-time
Explain how you would architect the dashboard, manage streaming data, and ensure low-latency updates for real-time insights.

3.2.4 Let's say that we want to improve the "search" feature on the Facebook app.
Discuss search algorithms, ranking strategies, and how you would measure and improve relevance and speed.

3.2.5 Designing a pipeline for ingesting media to built-in search within LinkedIn
Detail the ingestion process, indexing strategies, and considerations for scalability and fault tolerance.

3.2.6 Modifying a billion rows
Talk about strategies for handling massive data updates, including batching, parallelism, and rollback mechanisms.

3.3 Data Analysis & Experimentation

Software Engineers at Research Square often collaborate with data teams, so you may be asked about designing experiments, analyzing results, and making data-driven decisions.

3.3.1 The role of A/B testing in measuring the success rate of an analytics experiment
Explain the setup of control and test groups, metrics for evaluation, and how you would interpret statistical significance.

3.3.2 You work as a data scientist for ride-sharing company. An executive asks how you would evaluate whether a 50% rider discount promotion is a good or bad idea? How would you implement it? What metrics would you track?
Discuss how you would design an experiment, select key metrics (e.g., retention, revenue), and analyze the impact of the promotion.

3.3.3 Let's say you work at Facebook and you're analyzing churn on the platform.
Describe your approach to measuring retention, segmenting users, and identifying drivers of churn.

3.3.4 How would you design user segments for a SaaS trial nurture campaign and decide how many to create?
Explain how you would use data to define segments, test their effectiveness, and iterate based on results.

3.3.5 Assessing the market potential and then use A/B testing to measure its effectiveness against user behavior
Outline how you would estimate market size, design experiments, and analyze outcomes to inform product decisions.

3.4 Communication & Stakeholder Management

Software Engineers at Research Square are expected to communicate technical concepts clearly and collaborate with cross-functional teams. These questions assess your ability to translate data insights to actionable recommendations and manage expectations.

3.4.1 How to present complex data insights with clarity and adaptability tailored to a specific audience
Discuss strategies for simplifying technical language, using visualizations, and adjusting your message for different stakeholders.

3.4.2 Demystifying data for non-technical users through visualization and clear communication
Explain your approach to making data accessible, choosing the right visualization tools, and ensuring stakeholders understand key findings.

3.4.3 Making data-driven insights actionable for those without technical expertise
Talk about how you bridge the gap between technical and business audiences, focusing on actionable takeaways.

3.4.4 Strategically resolving misaligned expectations with stakeholders for a successful project outcome
Describe methods for clarifying requirements, managing scope, and maintaining alignment through regular communication.

3.5 Data Cleaning & Organization

Handling messy data is a common challenge. Expect questions about your experience cleaning, organizing, and validating data to ensure reliable analytics and smooth system operation.

3.5.1 Describing a real-world data cleaning and organization project
Share your process for profiling, cleaning, and validating datasets, as well as tools and techniques you use for automation.

3.5.2 Challenges of specific student test score layouts, recommended formatting changes for enhanced analysis, and common issues found in "messy" datasets.
Explain how you would restructure the data, identify inconsistencies, and ensure it’s ready for analysis.

3.5.3 Missing Housing Data
Discuss strategies for handling missing values, including imputation, deletion, and analyzing the impact on results.

3.5.4 Matching Siblings
Describe your approach to record linkage, deduplication, and ensuring data integrity across related datasets.

3.6 Behavioral Questions

3.6.1 Tell me about a time you used data to make a decision.
Describe the context, the data you analyzed, and the impact of your recommendation. Focus on how your insights drove measurable business outcomes.

3.6.2 Describe a challenging data project and how you handled it.
Share a specific example, the obstacles faced, and the steps you took to overcome them. Emphasize your problem-solving and collaboration skills.

3.6.3 How do you handle unclear requirements or ambiguity?
Explain your process for clarifying goals, gathering missing information, and adapting your approach when requirements shift.

3.6.4 Tell me about a time when your colleagues didn’t agree with your approach. What did you do to bring them into the conversation and address their concerns?
Discuss how you encouraged open dialogue, presented evidence, and reached a consensus or compromise.

3.6.5 Describe a time you had trouble communicating with stakeholders. How were you able to overcome it?
Highlight your communication strategies, adjustments you made for your audience, and the outcome of your efforts.

3.6.6 Explain a situation where you had to negotiate scope creep when two departments kept adding “just one more” request. How did you keep the project on track?
Describe how you quantified additional effort, prioritized requirements, and maintained transparency with stakeholders.

3.6.7 When leadership demanded a quicker deadline than you felt was realistic, what steps did you take to reset expectations while still showing progress?
Share your approach to communicating risks, renegotiating deliverables, and managing stakeholder expectations.

3.6.8 Give an example of how you balanced short-term wins with long-term data integrity when pressured to ship a dashboard quickly.
Discuss the trade-offs you made, strategies for maintaining quality, and how you communicated limitations.

3.6.9 Tell me about a situation where you had to influence stakeholders without formal authority to adopt a data-driven recommendation.
Explain how you built credibility, used evidence, and navigated organizational dynamics to drive change.

3.6.10 Walk us through how you handled conflicting KPI definitions (e.g., “active user”) between two teams and arrived at a single source of truth.
Describe your approach to aligning stakeholders, facilitating discussion, and establishing clear, consistent metrics.

4.1 Company-specific tips:

Research Square is deeply committed to advancing scholarly communication, so start by developing a clear understanding of its mission and the products it offers. Review how its platforms support researchers and publishers through services like language editing, video abstracts, and editorial checks. This knowledge will help you contextualize your technical answers and show your genuine interest in the company’s impact on the academic community.

Familiarize yourself with the unique challenges of building software for academic publishing. Research Square values practical engineering solutions—be prepared to discuss how you would design tools that are reliable, scalable, and user-friendly for researchers and publishers. Think about how you would address issues such as data privacy, accessibility, and internationalization in your solutions.

Demonstrate your ability to work collaboratively with cross-functional teams. At Research Square, software engineers frequently interact with product managers, designers, and non-technical stakeholders. Prepare examples that highlight your communication skills, your ability to translate technical concepts for broader audiences, and your experience gathering requirements from diverse groups.

Stay up-to-date on recent developments and innovations in research publishing and academic technology. Reference relevant trends—such as open access or digital transformation in scholarly communication—when discussing your motivation for joining Research Square. This will show your awareness of the industry and your alignment with the company’s long-term goals.

4.2 Role-specific tips:

4.2.1 Master algorithms and data structures, focusing on real-world applications.
Expect technical questions that require you to implement algorithms like shortest path (Dijkstra’s, Bellman-Ford), solve grid-based problems, and demonstrate a strong grasp of recursion with classics like Tower of Hanoi. Practice explaining your logic, handling edge cases, and optimizing for performance—especially in scenarios relevant to academic platforms, such as processing large datasets or modeling user interactions.

4.2.2 Prepare for system design interviews by breaking down complex products.
You may be asked to design scalable systems such as digital classrooms, sales dashboards, or search pipelines. Structure your answers by identifying core components, data flows, and scalability considerations. Discuss trade-offs in technology choices, and relate your design decisions to the needs of researchers and publishers—such as supporting real-time collaboration or ensuring high availability.

4.2.3 Show your data analysis and experimentation skills.
Research Square values engineers who can collaborate with data teams and make informed decisions. Be ready to discuss how you would set up A/B tests, measure retention, and analyze user segments. Use examples where you designed or interpreted experiments to drive product improvements, and explain your approach to selecting metrics and evaluating statistical significance.

4.2.4 Highlight your ability to clean and organize messy data.
You’ll often work with unstructured or incomplete datasets, so prepare to discuss your process for profiling, cleaning, and validating data. Share real-world examples where you automated data cleaning, handled missing values, or restructured complex datasets for analysis. Emphasize the importance of data integrity in delivering reliable features to academic users.

4.2.5 Demonstrate strong communication and stakeholder management skills.
Research Square’s collaborative environment means you’ll need to present technical concepts clearly and adapt your message for different audiences. Practice explaining engineering decisions to non-technical stakeholders, using visualizations and analogies. Be ready to share examples of resolving misaligned expectations, negotiating scope, and facilitating consensus across teams.

4.2.6 Prepare behavioral stories using the STAR method.
Reflect on experiences where you solved challenging problems, navigated ambiguity, or influenced team direction. Structure your responses to highlight the situation, your actions, and the results. Focus on moments that showcase your growth mindset, adaptability, and commitment to quality—especially when balancing short-term deliverables with long-term reliability.

4.2.7 Be ready to discuss trade-offs and technical decisions.
In onsite interviews, you’ll be asked to walk through previous projects and justify your design choices. Prepare to articulate the reasoning behind your approach, how you balanced competing priorities, and the impact of your decisions on users and stakeholders. Use examples that demonstrate your ability to think strategically and communicate complex ideas with clarity.

4.2.8 Practice writing clean, well-documented code for take-home assessments.
Research Square’s technical challenges often involve take-home assignments. Focus on producing code that is easy to read, logically structured, and thoroughly tested. Include clear documentation and comments to explain your thought process, edge case handling, and any assumptions. This attention to detail will set you apart and reflect your commitment to engineering excellence.

4.2.9 Prepare questions to ask your interviewers.
Show your engagement by preparing thoughtful questions about Research Square’s engineering culture, product roadmap, and collaboration processes. Ask about the biggest technical challenges the team is facing, opportunities for innovation, and how software engineers contribute to the company’s mission. This will demonstrate your enthusiasm and help you assess if the company is the right fit for you.

5.1 “How hard is the Research Square Software Engineer interview?”
The Research Square Software Engineer interview is considered moderately challenging, especially for those with a solid foundation in algorithms, system design, and collaborative problem-solving. The process emphasizes not just technical proficiency but also your ability to communicate ideas clearly and work effectively in cross-functional teams. Candidates with experience building scalable, user-centric web applications and a passion for supporting research and academic publishing will find themselves well-prepared for the unique challenges of this interview.

5.2 “How many interview rounds does Research Square have for Software Engineer?”
Typically, the Research Square Software Engineer interview process consists of 4 to 5 rounds: an initial application and resume review, a recruiter screen, a technical or take-home assessment, a behavioral interview, and a final onsite or virtual panel interview. Each stage is designed to evaluate different aspects of your skills, from coding and system design to communication and culture fit.

5.3 “Does Research Square ask for take-home assignments for Software Engineer?”
Yes, most candidates for the Software Engineer role at Research Square are given a take-home technical assessment. This assignment usually focuses on real-world coding problems, algorithmic challenges, or practical system design tasks relevant to academic publishing and digital platforms. The goal is to assess your ability to write clean, efficient, and well-documented code while demonstrating logical problem-solving and attention to detail.

5.4 “What skills are required for the Research Square Software Engineer?”
Key skills include strong programming abilities (in languages such as Python, JavaScript, or Java), a deep understanding of algorithms and data structures, and experience in system design and building scalable web applications. Familiarity with data analysis, experimentation (e.g., A/B testing), and data cleaning is also valuable. Equally important are communication skills, the ability to collaborate with cross-functional teams, and a genuine interest in supporting research and academic publishing.

5.5 “How long does the Research Square Software Engineer hiring process take?”
The typical timeline for the Research Square Software Engineer hiring process is 2 to 4 weeks from application to offer. Fast-track candidates may move through the process in as little as 1 to 2 weeks, while scheduling and take-home assessments can occasionally extend the timeline. Clear communication with your recruiter can help keep the process moving smoothly.

5.6 “What types of questions are asked in the Research Square Software Engineer interview?”
You can expect a mix of technical and behavioral questions. Technical questions often focus on algorithms (such as shortest path or recursion problems), system design (like building scalable digital classrooms or dashboards), and practical coding tasks. Behavioral questions assess your teamwork, communication, problem-solving approach, and alignment with Research Square’s mission. You may also encounter scenarios involving data cleaning, experiment design, and stakeholder management.

5.7 “Does Research Square give feedback after the Software Engineer interview?”
Research Square typically provides feedback through your recruiter, especially after technical and onsite rounds. While the feedback may be high-level, it often covers your strengths and areas for improvement. If you are not selected, you can request additional feedback to help guide your preparation for future opportunities.

5.8 “What is the acceptance rate for Research Square Software Engineer applicants?”
While specific acceptance rates are not publicly disclosed, the Research Square Software Engineer role is competitive, reflecting the company’s high standards for technical skill and cultural fit. Based on industry benchmarks, the acceptance rate is estimated to be around 3–5% for qualified applicants.

5.9 “Does Research Square hire remote Software Engineer positions?”
Yes, Research Square offers remote opportunities for Software Engineers, with many roles designed to support flexible and distributed work. Some positions may require occasional in-person meetings or collaboration sessions, but the company is committed to supporting remote work as part of its inclusive, mission-driven culture.

• Related guides:
  • Research Square interview questions
  • Software Engineer interview guide
  • Top data science interview tips

Ready to ace your Research Square Software Engineer interview? It’s not just about knowing the technical skills—you need to think like a Research Square Software Engineer, solve problems under pressure, and connect your expertise to real business impact. That’s where Interview Query comes in with company-specific learning paths, mock interviews, and curated question banks tailored toward roles at Research Square and similar companies.

With resources like the Research Square Software Engineer Interview Guide and our latest case study practice sets, you’ll get access to real interview questions, detailed walkthroughs, and coaching support designed to boost both your technical skills and domain intuition.

Take the next step—explore more case study questions, try mock interviews, and browse targeted prep materials on Interview Query. Bookmark this guide or share it with peers prepping for similar roles. It could be the difference between applying and offering. You’ve got this!