A reported UBS Data Analyst process used four conversations: background screening, SQL and Python technical work, HR behavioral discussion, and a hiring-manager conversation about team fit and communication.
$96K
Avg. Base Comp
$132K
Avg. Total Comp
4 rounds
Typical Rounds
2-4 weeks
Process Length
For the UBS Data Analyst interview, the available candidate report points to a four-part process that begins with a conversational screening and then moves into technical assessment, HR discussion, and a hiring-manager conversation. SQL and Python were the technical center of the reported process. The candidate described SQL questions on joins, aggregations, filtering, and window functions, using two tables and a sequence of typical query problems. The emphasis was not solely on recalling syntax: they were also asked to explain how they would approach a business problem.
Python discussion focused on pandas, manipulating datasets, and making the reasoning behind an approach clear. The same report also mentions data-science and predictive-model questions, including how to build, evaluate, and interpret a model. Prepare to describe tradeoffs in plain language rather than treating the technical round as a coding-only exercise.
The nontechnical conversations were also role-relevant. Screening covered background, projects, motivation for moving, and alignment with the role. HR explored stakeholder work, disagreements, and competing priorities; the hiring manager discussed team projects, problem-solving style, and communicating technical ideas to nontechnical people. With one position-matched report available, the exact format beyond these four conversations is not established.
Synthesized from 1 candidate report by our editorial team.
Had an interview recently?
Share your experience. Unlock the full guide.
Real interview reports from people who went through the Ubs process.
The first round was a screening interview. It was mostly about my background: what I had worked on, why I wanted to move, and whether my experience matched the role. It was quite conversational, and I left feeling confident because it was mostly about projects I already knew well.
The second round was the technical interview, and that was definitely the hardest part. They focused mainly on SQL and Python. The SQL questions started with joins, aggregations, and filtering data, but then became more analytical. They wanted to see how I approached business problems, not just whether I knew the syntax. In Python, the questions were centered around data manipulation with pandas, handling datasets, and explaining my thought process rather than writing hundreds of lines of code.
The third interview was with HR. That one was more about motivation, communication, and cultural fit. They asked about situations where I had worked with stakeholders, dealt with disagreements, and managed competing priorities. It wasn't technically difficult, but it required clear examples from my previous experience.
The final round was with the hiring manager. This felt more like a discussion than an interrogation. We talked about the team, the types of projects they were working on, how I like to solve problems, and what I wanted from my next role. They were also trying to understand whether I'd fit into the team and whether I could communicate technical ideas to non-technical people.
Questions asked: I was given two tables and asked to solve a series of typical SQL questions. The interview covered topics such as joins, aggregations, filtering, and window functions, as well as some basic pandas operations. Beyond the coding exercises, they also asked questions about data science concepts and model development, focusing on how I would approach building, evaluating, and interpreting predictive models. Overall, the interview was a mix of SQL, pandas, and general data science knowledge rather than just coding.
Share your own interview experience to unlock all reports, or subscribe for full access.
Sourced from candidate reports and verified by our team.
Topics based on recent interview experiences.
Featured question at Ubs
Which model would perform better and why?
| Question | |
|---|---|
| Hurdles In Data Projects | |
| Lasso vs Ridge | |
| Data Preparation for Imbalanced Data | |
| Company Acquisition Choice | |
| Decision Tree Evaluation | |
| Stakeholder Communication | |
| Your Strengths and Weaknesses | |
| Martingale Strategy | |
| Student Tests | |
| Statistically Significant Test | |
| 2nd Highest Salary | |
| Employee Salaries | |
| Bagging vs Boosting | |
| Random SQL Sample | |
| P-value to a Layman | |
| Size of Joins | |
| Random Forest Explanation | |
| Type-ahead Search | |
| Scalped Ticket | |
| WAU vs Open Rates | |
| Missing Housing Data | |
| Three Zebras | |
| Assumptions of Linear Regression | |
| Classification and Regression | |
| Target Indices | |
| Success Measurement | |
| RAG Strict Source Control | |
| HHT or HTT | |
| Duplicate Rows |
Synthesized from candidate reports. Individual experiences may vary.
One candidate reports that the first conversation was a screening interview focused on prior work, reasons for a move, and whether their experience matched the role. Be ready to explain projects you know well and connect them directly to data-analysis work.
The candidate describes the technical interview as the hardest stage. It covered SQL joins, aggregations, filtering, window functions, and a two-table exercise, plus pandas-based data manipulation. Expect to explain your reasoning for a business problem, not only produce syntax.
In the reported third interview, HR asked about motivation, communication, cultural fit, stakeholder collaboration, disagreements, and competing priorities. Prepare concise examples that show how you worked through those situations and made your role clear.
The candidate reports a final discussion with the hiring manager about team projects, problem-solving preferences, and what they wanted next. It may also assess whether you can communicate technical ideas to nontechnical colleagues.
